Member-only story

Logical Reasoning Explanations: LSAT Preptest Logical Reasoning Explanations

Ernest J. Gaines

·3.9k Followers· Follow

Published in LSAT PrepTest 63: Logical Reasoning Explanations (LSAT PrepTest (Logical Reasoning Explanations))

4 min read

1.3k View Claps

89 Respond

Save

Listen

There are three main types of logical reasoning questions on the LSAT:

When you approach a logical reasoning question, it is important to first identify the type of question. This will help you to determine the best way to approach the question.

For deductions, you should start by identifying the premises and the . Then, you should check to see if the is logically supported by the premises. If it is not, then the argument is invalid.

LSAT PrepTest 63: Logical Reasoning Explanations (LSAT PrepTest (Logical Reasoning Explanations))

by Steve Schwartz

4.7 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1644 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	108 pages
Screen Reader	:	Supported

For inductions, you should start by identifying the evidence and the generalization. Then, you should check to see if the generalization is supported by the evidence. If it is not, then the argument is weak.

For flaws, you should start by identifying the argument. Then, you should look for any flaws in the reasoning, the evidence, or the assumptions. If you find a flaw, then you should explain why the flaw makes the argument invalid.

When you write an explanation for a logical reasoning question, it is important to be clear and concise. You should use specific examples from the question to support your explanation. You should also avoid using jargon or technical terms.

Here is an example of a clear and effective explanation for a logical reasoning question:

Question:

Which of the following is a flaw in the following argument?

The government should not ban assault weapons because they are used in self-defense.

Explanation:

The flaw in this argument is that it relies on a false dichotomy. The argument presents only two options: either ban assault weapons or allow them to be used in self-defense. However, there are other options, such as regulating the sale of assault weapons or requiring background checks for all gun purchases.

Logical reasoning is a critical skill for success on the LSAT. With practice, you can learn to approach logical reasoning questions strategically and develop clear and effective explanations. By following the tips in this article, you can improve your logical reasoning skills and increase your score on the LSAT.

LSAT PrepTest 63: Logical Reasoning Explanations (LSAT PrepTest (Logical Reasoning Explanations))

by Steve Schwartz

4.7 out of 5